How long have we got?

Last month I expressed personal alarm at the weather and the unexpected speed of change. Since then the global weather continues to break records, and I've thought of something slightly more constructive to say.

The asteroid which brushed passed the earth on Thursday was only identified as such the day before. Presumably our instruments calculated that it wasn't a risk and the alarm wasn't raised. But had the trajectory been six earth diameters to the side, how much notice would we have had to prepare ourselves for a 30 Hiroshima-bomb impact somewhere on the earth? What if the authorities decided not to tell anybody because there wasn't time to prepare and it would just cause unnecessary panic?

Sometimes climate change feels like that. We know time is running out, but governments are failing to tell the truth (for whatever reason) so we don't have the information or the political power to respond appropriately. No wonder people are waking up to the shortness of time and wondering how long they've got.

But the question in that form is poorly articulated perhaps because of the panic behind it. Who is we? What do we need time for? Do we really need to know? Might living in unknowing be wiser than planning for one specific possible future?

This post is an attempt to answer for myself. I want to avoid conflict and oppression in my own life and contribute to attempts to reduce harm. How long do I have for that?

It seems to me that no-one wants to be so irresponsible as to make a prediction too short. The shortest predictions are the most dangerous and potentially embarrassing, because they invoke the maximum panic and will be proven wrong the soonest. Mavericks like Guy McPhearson are marginalised and even belittled for advising us that "Only love remains".

At the more respectable end of the panic spectrum the UN is pushing countries to make 2050 commitments. But from the precautionary principle, it could be argued that that this date is even more irresponsible if it gives anyone the impression that we have wiggle-room.

So how long have we got? If someone would just give us a clue, we might make better decisions. If I knew an asteroid might hit my city 24 hours from now I might try to escape the impact zone, or seek or construct some kind of shelter; but if I had ten minutes I'd be lucky to get my children out of the building and underground. Less than that, and at least I could follow the advice of the Chinese/World government in the apocalypse action thriller The Wandering Earth to go back to my family and be with my loved ones.

Unfortunately climate change is not a Newtonian body in constant motion through predictable space, but a very large and complex system which eludes accurate modelling by computers. We don't know how long we've got or what event we dread. Every number you hear representing a target, threshhold or deadline, such as 12 years, 1.5 degrees, '2050 tipping point' is chosen by public relations advisors as a strategic target for policy makers and should be taken with a large pinch of salt. The body which has promoted most of those numbers has failed us badly by implying those things were knowable, and then placing them far too far in the future. But even if the models were accurate it wouldn't help very much because our well being depends in large part not on the weather but on society, another complex system which is premised on the first. That's not including the economy, another system which nobody understands, and which is designed to fail suddenly, unexpectedly and catastrophically.

The future most of us should be concerned about is not death in a heatwave or hurricane, or drowning in a rising tide, but social and political failure in a civilisation unable to adapt to changes in its environment.

So how long have we got - until what? I'm concerned that there's too much vague fearmongering and not enough thinking about how our society is most likely to fail. It probably won't be a distinct 'event' as its known in prepper-speak, a jump from capitalism to cannibalism, but could unfold in different ways and lead to different outcomes, some more preferable than others. Fiction can help us imagine possible futures like the charred landscape and fearful encounters of the The Road or living in a sealed dome of Logan's Run. The best prediction we can hope to make is to project forwards from now in a straight line, and for me Children of Men is the movie that does that best. Notice the police and the public, the dirt and decay, the slim hopes!

The continuing shocking weather will lead to poor harvests this year and probably poorer next year. Kudos to AllFed for their work on food security already. Around that time, maybe the year after, global food markets will go crazy as the rich countries begin hoarding food in earnest. It won't be the shortage itself so much as the political handling of it which will be brutal. Even now many humans are already starving for political reasons while food rots in vast warehouses. Lloyds of London predicted that Africa would be hit hardest and soonest. Maybe we could feed ourselves for a few years, but without improved yields it wouldn't be long before we saw food rationing in developed countries and governments using emergency rhetoric, political repression and of course debt-slavery to maintain order.

This at least seems like the harsh direction of the capitalist road we are on. The self-entitled, super-wealthy business and political classes will requisition everything to sustain themselves in militarised island ecovillages.

They would manage the rationing system while infrastructure decayed and schools and hospitals services failed and closed. Growing numbers of unemployed destitutes would be left to fend for themselves, dying younger than their parents from poverty related causes, including disease and violence.

So if I told you how long you had, would you wait until the last minute? One thing is for sure that you don't want to get caught in the rush for the exit. Once everyone else starts to panic, considered, conscientious action becomes much harder.

In his Deep Adaptation paper Jem Bendell put his neck out and guessed we had 10 years before 'societal collapse'. After a year of reflecting on this and of reading alarming science, I'm currently guessing that widespread food panics will come to dominate international politics in the next 2-4 years. The introduction of rationing will herald the crumbling of our political and financial freedoms.

So in my mind as a Western European, that 2-4 years is my window to do whatever I think necessary, desirable or possible with relative freedom. After that I think life will become harder, and choices narrower.

We can not now prevent a massive die-off of all that sustains us, starting with the insects now, expanding to the fish, trees, and surely also the grasses we depend on for food. However bleak the outlook seems - it could be worse. Maybe we'll go extinct and maybe we won't; wise choices could make the difference between the two. It is still possible to reduce the coming anguish and suffering; to reduce the mess and leave opportunities for the cockroaches to thrive after us; to face the future with dignity and open eyes.

I think many of should be looking at quitting our jobs in the commercial machine, preferably with a spectacular act of nonviolent industrial sabotage, cashing in our pensions and investing in real things we care about, whether it be survival, justice, personal or collective redemption, or just pleasure.

I believe there may still be important political/collective options which would both lessen the suffering and increase our survival odds. Neither of those things seem to matter to many people I talk to, but Extinction Rebellion is closest to my way of thinking right now. To me the wonder of the universe is enough to make me want more of it, so I expect I'll be working on system change as long as there is a system to change - not only with the hope to make things less bad, but because that is what I do.



What you wrote about projecting from the current situation to imagine the future reminded me of Margaret Atwood's "Maddaddam" trilogy (…). In case you want to read some darkly funny, intelligent and even poetic novels that look squarely at the near-term future and a desintegrating society, I highly recommend them.

One thing that keeps coming back to me as regards the notion of "the time that's left" is that: fundamentally, the Western mindset has grown extremely averse to uncertainty and unpredictability.

Most other civilisations in the world have (or had) the view that their wellbeing is in the hands of the gods (who like to play dice, as the Indians would have it). But in ours, we've become so infatuated with our tech and science and computers that most of us take it for granted that we have gained mastery over natural and cosmic processes - and that even in the case where this is obviously not the case yet, at least someone, somewhere, "should know" what's in store for us, so we can make the right plans. (Such beliefs are repeatedly challenged by financial crises and surprise asteroids, but cognitive dissonance isn't comfortable, so such contradictory elements are promptly swiped under the carpet)

Perhaps it made a little more sense, post-WW2 in rich industrialised countries, to have faith in an ever-improving future - what with welfare states, rising annual incomes, and a steady supply of oil. (Again, disregarding such events as the 1962 missile crisis for instance). Basically, things seemed to be steadily improving, at least materially, for most people - and for the middle-class baby-boomer generation, there has been little cause for concern over whether they would be able to comfortably retire in some warmer country at some point.

But such a mindset of confident self-projection into the future has now reached its lowest possible threshold of validity, ever, perhaps anywhere in the world. The possibility of "business as usual" (in the widest possible sense) continuing is practically non-existent, in very deep ways. Food production is of course one such dimension.

So it seems to me that even considering "how much time" we have before business-as-usual begins to crumble in an absolutely undeniable fashion should be considered, at best, as something of an academic question, at best something of the domain of personal curiosity. How much time before what? Upheavals are ongoing already - all we can safely count on is that pretty much everyone's boats will be rocking more and more fiercely with each passing year. The question of "when collapse began" will be a focal point of debate among future historians, if any remain - or alien archaelogists.

Therefore, to me a deeper, more urgent question would be: How can or should I transform my lifestyle and mindset in order to fully embrace radical uncertainty and impermanence? How can I dwell with this state of unknowing and obscurity, let it sink as deep as possible within me, and make it inform everything I do?

Once I have become better steeped in this spirit, it won't matter if 5 or 10 or 50 years go by before I find myself conclusively asserting that "shit has indeed hit the fan"... Qui vivra verra (whoever's still alive will figure it out), as we say in French!


We’ve been “asleep at the wheel”, far too long.
God help us open our eyes and smell the reality.


The planet is far more resilient than our economic system at present. If human suffering is what concerns you than stay focused on economic collapse, as it is now upon us. We need you. We need community currency. The financial crisis of 2008 led many people to look for alternatives, and many more will come as the next crisis unfolds.

I've been struggling the last few days to set up CForge Hamlets for a new homeschool community that has arisen as a result of recent legislation in New York to eliminate the religious/personal exemption for childhood immunizations. Most of the parents involved have children that have been injured by a vaccine, and yet their doctors don't believe them and the state has now banned their kids from public education. There are 26,000 kids being kicked out of school in NY in the coming weeks.

My point is that tyranny, resulting from a failed political economic system is our ultimate problem, and economic collapse may be our best hope. I'm not saying the climate crisis isn't real or that it doesn't pose an existential threat, but that there is nothing we can do about it on a societal level, while we are ruled by criminal elite with the immense power of our highly centralized institutions.

We have no idea how long they will hold onto the reins of power, or how far they will go. But their power is so great that it would be naive to think we can up against it directly. The best we can do is opt out and build our own systems to support each other, and that's why community currency is brilliant. They are struggling to keep financial markets inflated as they appear to be getting increasingly desperate (cutting rates before a recession, negative rates, etc). When that ball drops, and people lose whatever financial security they had, it will be time for community currency.

Add new comment

The content of this field is kept private and will not be shown publicly.

Plain text

  • No HTML tags allowed.
  • Web page addresses and email addresses turn into links automatically.
  • Lines and paragraphs break automatically.

Plain text

  • No HTML tags allowed.
  • Lines and paragraphs break automatically.
  • Web page addresses and email addresses turn into links automatically.
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.

Theme by Danetsoft and Danang Probo Sayekti inspired by Maksimer